Log in
Search
Links
This Site
Wageningen UR Site
Advanced Search
Information for
Education
Research
Publications
News & Calendar
About Wageningen University
Jobs at
Contact
Future BSc students
Future BSc German students
Future MSc students (Dutch)
Future MSc students (EU)
Future MSc students (non EU)
Future exchange students
PhD Candidates
Current MSc students
Alumni
BSc programmes
BSc minors
MSc programmes
PhD programmes
Courses and training
Chair Groups
International Education
Research at the University
Chair groups
Research domain
Rankings / Citation index
Specialisation
Research themes
Graduate schools
Professors
Research facilities
We@WUR
Wageningen UR publications
Library Wageningen UR
Corporate publications
News
Newsroom
Archive
RSS
Calendar
Mission and strategy
Organisation Chart
Domain
Board
Financial information
Van Hall Larenstein
History
Internationalisation @ WU
Wageningen Campus
Organisation
Number of students
Graduates
Students' origins
Working at Wageningen University
Vacancies
Internal vacancies
Active worldwide
Career
Conditions of Employment
Earning a doctorate
Tenure Track
Facilities
The town of Wageningen
Addresses
Route description and map Wageningen
Contacts and experts
A to Z - Questions and answers
wageningen ur (home)
>
wageningen university (home)
>
news & calendar
>
archive
>
calendar
>
2004
>
drs. j.m.j. gosselink : alternatives for forage evaluation in ruminants
Drs. J.M.J. Gosselink : Alternatives for forage evaluation in ruminants
News
Newsroom
Archive
Calendar
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
News
RSS
Calendar
Open days
Courses
Congresses and symposia
PhD-graduations and speeches
26 Jan 2004 16:00
Unit:
Wageningen University
Location:
Aula (gebouw 362), Gen. Foulkesweg 1, Wageningen
Co Promotor:
dr. J.W. Cone; dr. J.P. Dulphy (INRA, France)
The objective of this thesis was to validate and to compare in situ and in vitro techniques with in vivo data. These techniques were also evaluated for future and practical use in feed evaluation for ruminants. The techniques were compared using the digestion data of 98 forages and the energy values: in vivo total tract organic matter digestibility (OMD) and rumen fermentable organic matter (FOM), and the protein values: microbial nitrogen synthesised in the rumen (MNS) and rumen escape N (REN). The in situ nylon bag technique, the pepsin-cellulase technique, the gas production technique (GPT) and the Tilley and Terry technique showed good potency to predict OMD and the in situ technique and GPT gave most accurate FOM predictions. MNS was evaluated using in vivo data from the literature and showed a significant relationship with the content of crude protein in forages. The method of conservation of forages had an extra effect on MNS. REN was determined using in situ and different in vitro techniques, but only ADIN (fibre attached N) had a good relationship with in vivo REN.
Print this activity
Disclaimer
General Terms and Conditions
Contact
All contents © 2011 Wageningen UR. All rights reserved.